Jamie Loeb vs Emily De Oliveira Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jun at 06:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Loeb vs E. De Oliveira

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 0 Oliveira
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 2 and Emily De Oliveira winning 0. The last match between Jamie Loeb and Emily De Oliveira was at the W75 Sumter, 03-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loeb | 1 |
| Oliveira | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W75 Sumter(06-03-25)
J. Loeb vs E. D. Oliveira H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $226,266 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.91% (324-277) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (16-16) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Loeb vs E. D. Oliveira Match Preview:
- In second serve performance over the past six months, Loeb has a slight edge, winning 40.4% of points compared to Oliveira's 35.5%.
- Looking at return game stats, Oliveira has a marginal advantage on second serve returns with 51.24%, slightly outperforming Loeb's 50.27%.
- When examining first serve return stats, both players are nearly identical, with Loeb at 32.91% and Oliveira at 32.45%.
- Which player handles pressure better? Loeb shows stronger breakpoint-saving abilities, securing 53.56% compared to Oliveira's 45.56%.
- Analyzing past performance, Oliveira has a higher match win percentage over the past year at 55.56% compared to Loeb's 48.28%.
- Do surface preferences matter in this matchup? Loeb excels on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Oliveira prefers Clay, also boasting a 57% win rate.
- Both have played predominantly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Oliveira achieving a better win rate at 53.85% compared to Loeb's 48.15%.
- When considering opponent quality, Oliveira has faced higher-ranked competitors, averaging a rank of 324.72, while Loeb's opponents averaged 378.02.
- In deciding sets, Loeb has been more successful, winning 47% of the time, while Oliveira only manages 33%.
- Break point conversion is a crucial factor; Oliveira is notably stronger here, converting 60.87% compared to Loeb's 39.34%.
Editorial Prediction (June 3, 2025, UTC):
Based on the second serve performance, Loeb has a minor edge, indicating a potential advantage in tightly contested service games.
Oliveira's superior breakpoint conversion rate could play a pivotal role, possibly allowing them to seize vital opportunities in pivotal moments.
Despite Oliveira's better win rate over the past year, Loeb's ability to save breakpoints and stronger performance in deciding sets could be decisive.
Oliveira has experienced tougher competition, yet Loeb's proficiency under pressure might prove influential should this match extend to crucial points.
In summary, while Oliveira presents a formidable challenge, Loeb's favorable in-game stats suggest they are the slight favorite to win this match.
Jamie Loeb vs Emily De Oliveira Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Loeb vs E. D. Oliveira H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:21:13 | Average Match Time | 1:21:13 |
| 46% (26/56) | 1st Serve % | 50% (23/46) |
| 88% (23/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 30% (9/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 50% (23/46) | Return Points Win % | 43% (24/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Loeb Recent Matches Played
E. D. Oliveira Recent Matches Played

J. Loeb vs E. D. Oliveira Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.91% (324/277) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (16/16) |
| 53.36% (739/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.05% (38/35) |
| 51.27% (6503/6180) | Games Win/Loss | 51.37% (338/320) |
| 57.06% (190/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 51.72% (90/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 52.17% (36/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32.00% (8/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1472 | Aces Total | 37 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1745 | Total Double Faults | 93 |
| 1:18:23 | Average Match Time | 1:13:59 |
| 516.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 296.34 |
| 54% (17485/32413) | 1st Serve % | 65% (905/1396) |
| 65% (11351/17485) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (530/905) |
| 46% (6867/14927) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (207/491) |
| 47% (1765/3778) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (92/177) |
| 44% (14442/33101) | Return Points Win % | 47% (670/1423) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.59% (23/31) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.80% (255/219) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 90.00% (27/3) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 54% (320/593) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (54/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 50% (92/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 83% (344/287) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (15/14) |
| 16% (344/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (15/1) |
| 14% (257/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (17/2) |